Horizon of Medical Education Development

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

Questionnaires of Articles

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Editorial policy

Peer Review Process

Advertising policy

Indexing and Abstracting

FAQ

Corrections, Retractions and Matters Arising

Authors General Guideline

Guide for Reviewers

Guideline of preparing Author Contribition

Audio Abstract Setting Guideline

Forms

Assessing the status of knowledge Translation from the perspective of a number of faculty members of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences

    Authors

    1 Department of Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

    2 PhD student in Curriculum Planning, , Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Ferdowsi University, Mashhad,Iran

    3 Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

    4 Associate professor of community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

,

Document Type : Original Article

Abstract

Introduction: Translation of research findings into the language of the audience and stakeholders is one of the most important parts of knowledge research. Knowledge transfer, indeed, is the method to use theoretical knowledge produced by universities to improve training processes and decisions based on observation. This study examines the status of knowledge translation among faculty members.
Materials & Methods: The study population consisted of all faculty members of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences in 2019. The research tool was the Knowledge Translation Questionnaire, which has been compiled and approved by the Knowledge Translation Committee of Tehran University of Medical Sciences whose validity and reliability of the questionnaire were also confirmed in the present study. Following the explaining, the objectives, data were collected using research tools that were completed by the faculty members and analyzed afterward.
Results: As to the results, compared to the total average of each influential parameter in knowledge translation, the highest mean (3.22) was related to the “changing the behavior of decision-makers or achieving practical results through research results” and the lowest mean (3.05), was related to “generate evidence that can be used in decision making”. The mean of other effective factors of knowledge translation was between (3.05-3.22).
Conclusion: Although some of the sub-factors show a favorable situation, none of the main parameters were in the expected situation

Keywords

References
1. Danaei M, Hosseini M, Habibkhoda B,
Falahi M, Shokooh F. Knowledge Translation
Status at The University of Social Welfare &
Rehabilitation. Journal of Medical Education
Development. 2010;2(3):9-16.
2. Straus SE, Tetroe JM, Graham ID.
Knowledge translation is the use of knowledge in
health care decision making. Journal of clinical
epidemiology. 2011;64(1):6-10.
3. Sumpter DF, Carthon JMB. Lost in
translation: Student perceptions of cultural
competence in undergraduate and graduate nursing
curricula. Journal of Professional Nursing.
2011;27(1):43-9.
4. Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP, Lavis JN, Hill
SJ, Squires JE. Knowledge translation of research
findings. Implementation science. 2012;7(1):50.
5. Hamdoun M, Jabbour CJC, Othman HB.
Knowledge transfer and organizational innovation:
Impacts of quality and environmental management.
Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018;193:759-70.
6. Munari F, Rasmussen E, Toschi L, Villani
E. Determinants of the university technology
transfer policy-mix: A cross-national analysis of
gap-funding instruments. The Journal of
Technology Transfer. 2016;41(6):1377-405.
7. Bacon E, Williams MD, Davies G.
Coopetition in innovation ecosystems: A
comparative analysis of knowledge transfer
configurations. Journal of Business Research.
2020;115:307-16.
8. Cesaroni F, Piccaluga A. The activities of
university knowledge transfer offices: towards the
third mission in Italy. The Journal of Technology
Transfer. 2016;41(4):753-77.
9. Paulin D, Suneson K. Knowledge transfer,
knowledge sharing and knowledge barriers–three
blurry terms in KM. Leading Issues in Knowledge
Management. 2015;2(2):73.
10. Liu C-HS. Examining social capital,
organizational learning and knowledge transfer in
cultural and creative industries of practice. Tourism
Management. 2018;64:258-70.
11. Majdzadeh R, Sadighi J, Nejat S, Mahani
AS, Gholami J. Knowledge translation for research
utilization: design of a knowledge translation
model at Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
Journal of Continuing Education in the Health
Professions. 2008;28(4):270-7.
12. Kennedy O, Masidonski P, Swierkosz E,
Davidson K, Dodson D, Edwards S. CDC
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2005; 54:
269-72. I. Lenfant C. Shattuck lecture: clinical
research to clinical practice-lost in translation. N
Engl J Med. 2003;349:868-74.
13. Mirzendehdel M, Eshlaghy AT.
Prioritizing Knowledge Management Models in
Information Technology Companies Depending on
Science and Technology Parks based on ANP; A
Case Study in Iran. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF
ECONOMICS, FINANCE AND
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES. 2012(50):22.
14. Gholami J, Majdzadeh R, Nedjat S, Nedjat
S, Maleki K, Ashoorkhani M, et al. How should we
assess knowledge translation in research
organizations; designing a knowledge translation
self-assessment tool for research institutes
(SATORI). Health research policy and systems.
2011;9(1):10.
15. Gholami J, Ahghari S, Motevalian A,
Yousefinejad V, Moradi G, Keshtkar A, et al.
Knowledge translation in Iranian universities: need
for serious interventions. Health research policy
and systems. 2013;11(1):43.
16. Ramezani A, Fathain M, Tajdin A.
Investigating critical success factors of knowledge
management in research organizations. Education,
Business and Society: Contemporary Middle
Eastern Issues. 2013; 8(1):10.
17. Yazdizadeh B, Majdzadeh R, Alami A,
Amrolalaei S. How can we establish more
successful knowledge networks in developing
countries? Lessons learnt from knowledge
networks in Iran. Health research policy and
systems. 2014;12(1):63.
18. Hosseini M, Ahmadi S, Sadeghi T,
Mirbaha S, Safarizadeh M. A Study on Status of
Knowledge Translation in Qazvin University of
Medical Sciences. Research in Medical Education.
2015;7(2):52-60.
19. Rostami V, Bastani P, Kavosi Z,
Ravangard R. Knowledge Translation Status in
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences.
Management Strategies in Health System.
2019;4(3):219-29.
20. Tajedini O, Azami M, Sadatmoosavi A.
The investigation of utilization of research findings
in humanities: the effects of individual
characteristics of faculty members on their
viewpoints. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-
journal). 2018;18(2):17-38.
21. Mohaghegh N, Zarghani M, Tahamtan I,
Ghasghaee A, Mousavi S. Assessing knowledge
translation in Iranian medical research centres.
International Journal of Information Science and
Management (IJISM). 2017;15 (2.)
22. Dakhesh S, Ostovar A, Yazdizadeh B,
Hamidi A. Knowledge translation process among
academic researchers: A case study of bushehr
university of medical sciences. Libri.
2018;68(3):259-68
Horizon of Medical Education Development
Volume 12, Issue 2
July 2021
Pages 56-45
Files
Share
How to cite
Statistics