• Register
  • Login
  • Persian

Horizon of Medical Education Development

  1. Home
  2. Applying Kirkpatrick's Evaluation Model in Iranian Nursing Studies: A Scoping Review

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

Questionnaires of Articles

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Editorial policy

Peer Review Process

Advertising policy

Indexing and Abstracting

FAQ

Corrections, Retractions and Matters Arising

Authors General Guideline

Guide for Reviewers

Guideline of preparing Author Contribition

Audio Abstract Setting Guideline

Forms

Applying Kirkpatrick's Evaluation Model in Iranian Nursing Studies: A Scoping Review

    Authors

    • Seyed Javad Hosseini 1
    • Mahbobeh Firooz 2
    • Hosseini Karimi moonaghi 3

    1 Student Research Committee, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

    2 Department of medical and Surgical, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran

    3 Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

,

Document Type : Review Article

10.22038/hmed.2022.67202.1229
  • Article Information
  • References
  • Download
  • How to cite
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract

Introduction: Iranian nursing researchers considered the Kirkpatrick model to evaluate educational programs. The present review study was conducted to determine the possibility of a systematic review and summarize the results on the Kirkpatrick model in Iranian nursing studies.
Materials & Methods: The present scoping review was conducted based on the Arksey & O'Malley framework. For this purpose, SID, Magiran, PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases, and Google Scholar search engine were searched with keywords "Kirkpatrick,” "Nursing,” and "Iran" and their Persian equivalents, without time limit. The final studies were selected based on the PRISMA framework. The information from included articles was extracted. In the last stage, the advice of four medical education and nursing experts were applied.
Results: Finally, 16 articles were included in this review. A total of five and 11 studies had quasi-experimental and observational designs, respectively. The Kirkpatrick model’s initial two stages were applied in the six studies. In addition, other studies used four levels of the model to evaluate educational programs. A systematic review study was not observed in the process of search. The six studies focused on the evaluation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation courses.
Conclusion: The current studies had weaknesses in using the evaluation model, such as the incompleteness of the evaluation steps. Future studies should focus on measuring all levels of the model. Further, the evaluation of educational interventions on patients based on the Kirkpatrick model should be considered. According to the available evidence, conducting a systematic review is impossible.

Keywords

  • Kirkpatrick
  • Nursing
  • Evaluation
  • Review
  • Scoping
  • XML
  • PDF 1.12 M
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • CHICAGO
  • VANCOUVER
References
1 .Changiz T. Fakhari M. Omid A. Kirkpatrick’s
Model: A Framework for Evaluating the
Effectiveness of Short-Term and in-Service
Training Programs. IJME. 2014;13(12):1058-72.
2 .Vassar M. Wheeler D. Davison M. Franklin J.
Program Evaluation in Medical Education: An
Overview of the Utilization-Focused Approach.
Journal of educational evaluation for health
professions. 2010;7(1):1-5.
3 .Cook DA. Ellaway RH. Evaluating Technology-
Enhanced Learning: A Comprehensive Framework.
Medical teacher. 2015;37(10):961-70.
4 .Haji F. Morin MP. Parker K. Rethinking
Programme Evaluation in Health Professions
Education: Beyond 'Did It Work?'. Medical
Education. 2013;47(4):342-51.
5.Kirkpatrick DL. The Four Levels of Evaluation.
In: Brown SM. Seidner CJ. editors. Evaluating
Corporate Training: Models and Issues. Dordrecht:
Springer Netherlands; 1998 .
6.Bates R. A Critical Analysis of Evaluation
Practice: The Kirkpatrick Model and the Principle
of Beneficence. Evaluation and Program Planning.
2004;27(3):341-7.
7.Arthur W Jr. Bennett W Jr. Edens PS. Bell ST.
Effectiveness of Training in Organizations: A
Meta-Analysis of Design and Evaluation Features.
J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(2):234-45.
8.Bewley WL. O'Neil HF. Evaluation of Medical
Simulations. Military Medicine. 2013;178(10):64-
75.
9.Dinmohammadi M. Avazeh A. Designing
Implementing and Evaluating the Settlement of the
Senior Undergraduate Nursing Students at the
Educational and Treatment Center of Zanjan
University of Medical Sciences. edujournal.
2019;12(33):1-7.
10.Rezaeian M. An Introduction to Scoping
Review. RUMS JOURNAL. 2018;17(4):291-2.
11.Firouzkouhi M. Alimohammadi N. Azizi N.
AbdollahiMohammad A. Different Types of
Review Studies and Their Role in Promoting
Nursing Knowledge: A Narrative Review. Journal
of Diabetes Nursing. 2021;9(1):1339-55.
12.O’Brien KK. Colquhoun H. Levac D. Baxter L.
Tricco AC. Straus S. et al. Advancing Scoping
Study Methodology: A Web-Based Survey and
Consultation of Perceptions on Terminology,
Definition and Methodological Steps. BMC health
services research. 2016;16(1):1-12.
13.Tricco AC. Lillie E. Zarin W. O’Brien K.
Colquhoun H. Kastner M. et al. A Scoping Review
on the Conduct and Reporting of Scoping Reviews.
BMC medical research methodology.
2016;16(1):1-10.
14.Arksey H. O'Malley L. Scoping Studies:
Towards a Methodological Framework.
International Journal of Social Research
Methodology. 2005;8(1):19-32.
15.Levac D. Colquhoun H. O'Brien KK. Scoping
Studies: Advancing the Methodology.
Implementation Science. 2010;5(1):69-78.
16.Thiese MS. Observational and Interventional
Study Design Types; an Overview. Biochemia
medica. 2014;24(2):199-210.
17.Chung E. Program Evaluation: Alternative
Approaches and Practical Guidelines. 3rd Edition
(Jody L Fitzpatrick. James R Sanders. Blaine R
Worthen). Korean Journal of Medical Education.
2008;20(4):377-387.
18.Dehghani MH. Dehghani tafti A. Raadabadi M.
The Effectiveness of Training Courses on
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (Cpr) Based on
Kirkpatrick Model. Journal of Nursing Education.
2019;8(3):33-8.
19.Mohammadi F. Momennasab M. Yektatalab S.
Kouchaki Z. Mozafari F. The Effectiveness of
Doctoral Program in Nursing in Iran Based on the
Patrick Model. Nursing and Midwifery Studies.
2016;5(3):e33726.
20.Zare M. Vizeshfar F. Evaluation of Health
Education Volunteering Program Based on
"Kirkpatrick Model". Jounal of Health Promotion
Management. 2019;8(1):30-4.
21.Lim DH. Yoon SW. Park S. Integrating
Learning Outcome Typologies for Hrd: Review
and Current Status. 2013;25(2):33-48.
22.Amiresmaili MR. Mirzaee M. Aminizadeh M.
Rahimisadegh R. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of
in-Service Training Based on the Kirkpatrick
Model: A Case Study of a Cardiopulmonary
Resuscitation (Cpr) Course for Nurses in
Afzalipour Hospital, Kerman, Iran. Strides in
Development of Medical Education.
2018;15(1):e89066.
23.Dorri S. Akbari M. Dorri Sedeh M. Kirkpatrick
Evaluation Model for in-Service Training on
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Iranian Journal of
Nursing and Midwifery Research. 2016;21(5):493-
7.
24.Nezamian Pourjahromi ZN. Ghafarian Shirazi
H. Ghaedi H. Momeninejad M. Mohamadi
Baghmolaee M. Abbasi A. et al. The Effectiveness
of Training Courses on “How to Work with Dc
Shock Device” for Nurses, Based on Kirkpatrick
Model. Iranian Journal of Medical Education.
2012;11(8):896-902.
25.Rafati F. Pilevarzade M. Kiani A. soltaninejad a.
Designing, Implementation and Evaluation of Osce
to Assess Nursing Students Clinical Competence in
Jiroft Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery. Uursing
and Midwifery Journal. 2020;18(2):118-28.
26.Ghorbandoost R. Zeinabadi HR. Shabani
Shafiabadi M. Mohammadi Z. Evaluation of in-
Service Training Course of Nurses and Midwives
(Neonatal Resuscitation) Using Kirkpatrick 'S
Model ". Research in Medical Education.
2020;12(3):4-11.
27.Keshavarzi MH. Masroor-Roodsari D. Janani L.
Zabihi zazoly A. Effect of Cognitive Strategies
Training on Nursing Students' Academic
Achievement in School of Nursing and Midwifery
of Iran University of Medical Sciences Based on
Kirk-Patrick Model. Journal of Medical Education
Development. 2019;12(34):9-13.
28.Shayan S. nowroozi rad n. Evaluation of the
Effectiveness of Staff in-Service Training System,
Tehran Taleghani Hospital with Kirickpatrik
Approach. Journal of Medicine and Cultivation.
2019;28(2):10-23.
29.Bijani M. Rostami K. Momennasab M.
Yektatalab S. Evaluating the Effectiveness of a
Continuing Education Program for Prevention of
Occupational Exposure to Needle Stick Injuries in
Nursing Staff Based on Kirkpatrick's Model.
Journal of the National Medical Association.
2018;110(5):459-63.
30.Ahanchian M. Sharafi S. Vafaee M. Hajiabadi
F. Evaluate the Effectiveness of Internship Program
in Nursing Student Using Kirkpatrick's Model.
Research in Medical Education. 2017;9(1):17-9.
31.Bakhshi-Hajikhajeloo S. Sattari S. Effectiveness
Evaluation of Cardiopulmonary Cerebral
Resuscitation Workshop in Clinical Atmosphere
Based on Kirkpatrick Model. Cardiovascular
Nursing Journal. 2017;6(3):16-22.
32.Akbari M. Dorri S. Mahvar T. The Effectiveness
of in-Service Training on Cardiopulmonary
Resuscitation: Report of First and Second Levels of
Kirkpatrick's Model. Development Strategies in
Medical Education. 2016;3(1):67-72.
33.Hojjati H. Mehralizadeh Yl. Farhadirad H.
Alostany S. Aghamolaei M. Assessing the
Effectiveness of Training Outcome Based on
Kirkpatrick Model: Case Study. Quarterly Journal
of Nursing Management. 2013;2(3):35-42
    • Article View: 1,583
    • PDF Download: 993
Horizon of Medical Education Development
Volume 14, Issue 2
August 2023
Pages 100-92
Files
  • XML
  • PDF 1.12 M
Share
How to cite
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • CHICAGO
  • VANCOUVER
Statistics
  • Article View: 1,583
  • PDF Download: 993

APA

Hosseini, S. J. , Firooz, M. and Karimi moonaghi, H. (2023). Applying Kirkpatrick's Evaluation Model in Iranian Nursing Studies: A Scoping Review. Horizon of Medical Education Development, 14(2), 100-92. doi: 10.22038/hmed.2022.67202.1229

MLA

Hosseini, S. J. , , Firooz, M. , and Karimi moonaghi, H. . "Applying Kirkpatrick's Evaluation Model in Iranian Nursing Studies: A Scoping Review", Horizon of Medical Education Development, 14, 2, 2023, 100-92. doi: 10.22038/hmed.2022.67202.1229

HARVARD

Hosseini, S. J., Firooz, M., Karimi moonaghi, H. (2023). 'Applying Kirkpatrick's Evaluation Model in Iranian Nursing Studies: A Scoping Review', Horizon of Medical Education Development, 14(2), pp. 100-92. doi: 10.22038/hmed.2022.67202.1229

CHICAGO

S. J. Hosseini , M. Firooz and H. Karimi moonaghi, "Applying Kirkpatrick's Evaluation Model in Iranian Nursing Studies: A Scoping Review," Horizon of Medical Education Development, 14 2 (2023): 100-92, doi: 10.22038/hmed.2022.67202.1229

VANCOUVER

Hosseini, S. J., Firooz, M., Karimi moonaghi, H. Applying Kirkpatrick's Evaluation Model in Iranian Nursing Studies: A Scoping Review. Horizon of Medical Education Development, 2023; 14(2): 100-92. doi: 10.22038/hmed.2022.67202.1229

  • Home
  • About Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap

News

  • Introduction to the Horizon Development Journal on ... 2025-05-11
  • SMS system 2024-09-17
  • The Scientific-Research Quarterly of Horizon of Medical ... 2024-11-17
  • Appreciation meeting of the referees of the scientific-research ... 2024-04-13
  • Special call for artificial intelligence 2024-04-06

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Newsletter Subscription

Subscribe to the journal newsletter and receive the latest news and updates

© Journal Management System. Powered by Sinaweb