Medical learners' viewpoint towards the Objective Structured Clinical Exam (OSCE) in Kashan University of Medical Sciences

Volume 11, Issue 1
August 2020
Pages 43-51

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D, Medical Education Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

2 Ph.D. candidate, Medical Education Development Center (EDC), Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran.

3 Professor, Department of Pediatric, Infectious Diseases Research Center, School of Medicine, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran

4 MSc, Department of Biostatic, School of Medicine, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran

5 General Medicine, School of Medicine, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran

6 Assistant Professor, Department of Biostatic, School of Medicine, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran

Abstract
Introduction:One of the final evaluation methods in most clinical departments of medical universities is the use of Objective Structured Clinical Exam (OSCE). Due to the importance of measuring the various dimensions of clinical skills in medical students, this study was conducted in 2019 with the aim of investigating the views of medical learners of Shahid Beheshti Hospital of Kashan University of Medical Sciences about this type of exam.
Materials & Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was performed with the participation of 103 medical students in residency, internship and clerkship stages. These students took the test at least once. The data collection tool, a valid and reliable questionnaire, including 23 Likert-scale questions to determine learners' views on the overall structure, how it was conducted, and the overall test. Data were analyzed using SPSS16 software.
Results: Most students agreed with the overall OSCE test (74.8%) with an average score of 59.6 ±10.1 and at a moderate level. There was no significant difference in the level of students' agreement with the whole OSCE exam and its’ general structure in terms of gender, degree and residency year, but in relation to the way the OSCE exam is held, the level of clerkships agreement was significantly higher than the internships and the residents (p = 0.022). Overall, from the point of view of most learners, the performance of OSCE test is at moderate level.
Conclusion: In general, the medical students of Kashan Shahid Beheshti Hospital had a positive view for the OSCE exam. However, the structure and manner of the test should be changed and its’ quality should be improved in terms of station content, attendance and standardized patient, and it should be used as an evaluation tool in the hospital's educational departments.

Keywords

1-Stern DT, Williams BC, Gill A, Gruppen LD,
Woolliscroft JO, Grum CM. Is there a relationship
between attending physicians' and residents'
teaching skills and students' examination scores?.
Academic Medicine. 2000. 1;75(11):1144-6.
2-Jalili Z, Nouhi E, Ahmadpour B.[Investigation of
medical stagers and interns satisfaction on OSCE
as a clinical skill evaluation method in Kerman
University of Medical Sciences]. Strides in
Development of Medical Education. 2005; 2(1):
18-24 [Persian].
3-Azizi F. Medical education mission, vision and
challenges. Tehran: Educational Affaire of Health
Ministry; 2004. p: 89-128.
4-Anbari KH , Zendedel A.[Clinical Competency].
Strides in Development of Medical Education.
2013; 10(3): 398-400. [Persian] .
5-Goff B, Mandel L, Lentz G, VanBlaricom A,
Oelschlager AM, Lee D, Galakatos A, Davies M,
Nielsen P. Assessment of resident surgical skills: is
testing feasible?. American journal of obstetrics
and gynecology. 2005. 1;192(4):1331-8.
6-Iramaneerat C. Instruction and assessment of
professionalism for surgery residents. Journal of
surgical education. 2009. 1;66(3):158-62.
7-Mandel LP, Lentz GM, Goff BA. Teaching and
evaluating surgical skills. Obstetrics &
Gynecology. 2000. 1;95(5):783-5.
8-Noohi E, Motesadi M, Haghdoost A. [Clinical
Teachers' Viewpoints towards Objective Structured
Clinical Examination in Kerman University of
Medical Science]. Iranian Journal of Medical
Education. 2008; 8(1): 113-119 [Persian].
9-Malekan Rad E, Einollahi B. Simple Guide for
Held Objective Structured Clinical Examination
(OSCE). Ministry of Health and Medical Education
Deputy Educational and Educational Directorate
Secretariat of the Medical Education Council.
2009.
10-Ministry of Health and Medical Education.
Vice-Chancellery for Education. [Aeiname azmoon
maharathaye balini dore pezeshki omomi]; 2016.
[Persian.]
11-Pierre RB, Wierenga A, Barton M, Branday JM,
Christie CD. Student evaluation of an OSCE in
paediatrics at the University of the West Indies,
Jamaica. BMC medical education. 2004. 1;4(1):22.
12-Faryabi J, Farzad M, Sinaei N. Dental students'
perspective on Objective Structured Clinical
Examination in Kerman university of medical
sciences. J Med Edu Develop Center. 2010; 6:34-9.
13-Shayan S, Eshraghi N, Maleki L. Analyzing and
comparing the results of Objective Structured
Clinical Examination (OSCE), in-group evaluation
and final improvement examination of
neurosurgical assistants of Isfahan University of
Medical Sciences in 2009-2010. Iranian Journal of
Medical Education. 2011. 10;10(5):634-42.
14-Mehralizadeh S, Ghorbani R, HajiAghajani S,
Shafie S. OSCE quality assessment: Medical
students and residents attitudes. Journal of Medical
Education Development. 2014. 10;7(16):127-35.
15-Daryazadeh S, Faghihi A, Jokar F, Yaghini O,
Esmaeeli A. Medical Students’ Viewpoints about
Clinical Competency Exam: A Qualitative Study.
Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2017.
15;17:100-9.
16-Sabouri A, Vahid Dastjerdi E, Mahdian M,
Kharazifard MJ. Dental residents' perceptions of
objective structured clinical examination (osce) as a
clinical evaluation method. journal of dental school
shahid beheshti university of medical science.
2010;28(2 (84)): 88-94.