Horizon of Medical Education Development

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

Questionnaires of Articles

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Editorial policy

Peer Review Process

Advertising policy

Indexing and Abstracting

FAQ

Corrections, Retractions and Matters Arising

Authors General Guideline

Guide for Reviewers

Guideline of preparing Author Contribition

Audio Abstract Setting Guideline

Forms

Evaluation of the logbook of the department of operative dentistry in Ardabil university of Medical Sciences at 2019 from students’ point of view

    Authors

    1 Assistant Professor of Operative Dentistry, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran.

    2 Assistant Professor of Social Factors Affecting Health Research Center, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran.

    3 Student of Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran

,

Document Type : Original Article

Abstract

Introduction:There are several tools for evaluating the achievement of educational goals. One of these tools is logbook. The aim of this study was to evaluate the logbook designed in the operative dentistry department from the students’ point of view.
Materials & Methods: In this cross-sectional descriptive study, 60 dental students included the study in the academic year of 2019. Information was collected through a researcher-made questionnaire in three sections: demographic data, logbook evaluation questions, and an open-ended question about suggestions. The validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by faculty members. The reliability of the questionnaire was confirmed by Cronbach´s alpha test with a coefficient of 0.8. Data analysis was performed using descriptive and analytical statistics.
Results: The mean overall evaluation score of Logbook was 28.98±5.77. 71.7% of students mentioned that the effect of logbook on their knowledge about the evaluation method was high and very high. Regarding the necessity of using logbook, 51.7% of students choose high and very high necessity. Using Pearson correlation test, there was a significant and positive relationship between the students’ final score of semester and their opinion about the Logbook evaluation. There was also a relationship between the logbook evaluation score and the experience of not using the logbook in the education period.
Conclusion: Based on the findings, in general, students' views on the use of logbook were moderate, and since logbook should meet the educational needs of all students, it is necessary to redesign its content.

Keywords

References
1. Fattahi H, Bazrafkan L, HasanLi E, Rad AB. The
Viewpoints of Dental Students of Shiraz toward the
Amount of Their Achievement to Learning
Objectives in Different Courses of Orthodontics.
Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2009;9 (3.)
2. MatlabNejad M, Madani Z, Ahmady A. Self
assessment of dental students’ professional
competence. Iranian Journal of medical education.
2005:135-46.
3. Roshangar F, Lotfi M, Zamanzadeh v,
Abdollahzadeh F, Davoodi A. The Effect of Using
Logbook on Nursing Students' Learning. Iranian
Journal of Medical Education. 2010;10(1):64-70.
eng.
4. Dent J, Harden RM, Hunt D. A practical guide
for medical teachers: Elsevier health sciences;
2017.
5. Blake K. The daily grind--use of log books and
portfolios for documenting undergraduate
activities. Medical education. 2001;35(12):1097.
6. Watters DA, Green AJ, Van Rij A. Requirements
for trainee logbooks. ANZ journal of surgery.
2006;76(3):181-4.
7. Cornwall PL, Doubtfire A. The use of the Royal
College of Psychiatrists' trainee's log book: a cross-
sectional survey of trainees and trainers.
Psychiatric Bulletin. 2001;25(6):234-6.
8. Murray E, Alderman P, Coppola W, Grol R,
Bouhuijs P, Van Der Vleuten C. What do students
actually do on an internal medicine clerkship? A
log diary study. Medical Education.
2001;35(12):1101-7.
9. Mazareie E, Momeni Danaei S, Hosseininezhad
S, Nili M. Evaluating the effect of logbook as
viewed by the juniors and seniors at Shiraz school
of dentistry. Strides in Development of Medical
Education. 2016;13(4):395-402.
10. TORABI K, BAZRAFKAN L, SEPEHRI S,
HASHEMI M. The effect of logbook as a study
guide in dentistry training. Journal of Advances in
Medical Education & Professionalism.
2013;1(3):81-4.
11. Seif AA. Educational measurement, assessment
and evaluation. Tehran: Doran Publications.
2004;128.
12. Thomson P, Boyle C. Auditing clinical teaching
in oral surgery: the use of a student log book.
Dental update. 1996;23(7):283-6.
13. Dolmans DH, Wolfhagen IH, Essed GG,
Scherpbier AJ, van der Vleuten CP. The impacts of
supervision, patient mix, and numbers of students
on the effectiveness of clinical rotations. Academic
Medicine. 2002;77(4):332-5.
14. Raghoebar-Krieger H, Sleijfer D, Bender W,
Stewart R, Popping R. The reliability of logbook
data of medical students: an estimation of
interobserver agreement, sensitivity and specificity.
Medical Education-Oxford. 2001;35(7):624-31.
15. Khogali S, Laidlaw J, Harden R. Erratum:
Study guides: A study of different formats. Medical
Teacher 28 (4), pp. 375-377. Medical Teacher.
2006;28(6):583 -.
16. Abdolmaleki M, Ashoorioun V, Momeni S,
Zarezadeh Y, Rokhzadi M. The influence of study
guide on clinical education of nursery students.
Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2011;10 (5.)
17. Jafari A, Shirazi M, Ahmadi H, Safarnavadeh
M, Soroush M. Lecturers and Students Perception
of Using a Study Guide. Strides in Development of
Medical Education. 2014;11(3):313-20.
18. Dahllof G, Tsilingaridis G, Hindbeck H. A
logbook for continuous self-assessment during 1
year in paediatric dentistry. European Journal of
Paediatric Dentistry. 2004;5:163-9.
19. Khorashadizadeh F, Alavinia S. Students'
perception about logbooks: advantages, limitation
and recommendation-a qualitative study. J Pak
Med Assoc. 2012;62(11):1186-4.
20. Paice E, Moss F, West G, Grant J. Association
of use of a log book and experience as a
preregistration house officer: interview survey.
BMJ. 1997;314(7075):213.
21. Wimmers PF, Schmidt HG, Splinter TA.
Influence of clerkship experiences on clinical
competence. Medical education. 2006;40(5):450-8.
22. Coates WC, Gendy MS, Gill AM. Emergency
medicine subinternship: can we provide a standard
clinical experience? Academic emergency
medicine. 2003;10(10):1138-41.
23. Dickson KL, Miller MD, Devoley MS. Effect
of textbook study guides on student performance in
introductory psychology. Teaching of Psychology.
2005;32(1):34-9.
24. Golmakani N, Yousefzadeh S. The midwifery
students’ perspective about clinical evaluation
based on log book. Journal of Research
Development in Nursing & Midwifery.
2012;9(1):103-11.
25. Kamali S, Jafari E. Evaluation of midwifery
clinical teachers and students viewpoints towards
logbook. Journal of Medical Education
Development. 2009;1(1):1-8.
26. Dennick R. Case study 2: Use of logbooks.
Medical Education. 2000;34:66-8.
27. Yu T-CW, Wheeler BR, Hill AG. Effectiveness
of standardized clerkship teaching across multiple
sites. Journal of Surgical Research.
2011;168(1):e17-e23.
28. Shakurnia A, Torabpour M, Elhampour H.
Correlation between student evaluation of teaching
and students’ grades. Iranian journal of medical
education. 2006;6(1):51-8.
29. McAlister B. Using All Your Legs: How
Student Evaluations Can Fit Into a Holistic
Teaching Assessment Program.[Cited 2012 April 3]
Horizon of Medical Education Development
Volume 11, Issue 3
December 2020
Pages 58-45
Files
Share
How to cite
Statistics