Explaining the experiences of Part-time undergraduate operating room students from teaching by blended learning method: A qualitative approach

² Ph.D Student in Medical Education, Medical Education Research Center, Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

³ Ph.D Student of Medical Education, Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

⁴ Bachelor of operating room and Master student of intensive care nursing, Alborz School of Paramedical Sciences, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran

⁵ Faculty member, Department of Operating Room, School of Paramedical Sciences, Alborz University of Medical Science, karaj, Iran.

Document Type : Original Article

10.22038/hmed.2021.54833.1119

Abstract

Introduction: Blended learning (BL) is trending among medical education colleges around the world, and its many benefits, including the lack of physical presence in all sessions, have led to the popularity of this teaching method for adult learners. Therefore, the present study was conducted to explain the experiences of Part-time undergraduate operating room students from teaching by Blended learning method.
Materials & Methods: This qualitative research was conducted by content analysis method in the first semester of 2019. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews during 15 interviews with Part-time operating room students. Then the data were analyzed by content analysis using MaxQDA2 software.
Results: Data in three main categories of "challenges" with subcategories; Selection of appropriate curriculum content and secure social network, "Arrangements related to the implementation of the program by professors" category with sub-categories; Ability of teachers to teach and be motivated and the category of "brought" with subcategories; Multiplicative individual growth and interaction and increased self-confidence were categorized.
Conclusion: Based on the findings of the study, the use of this teaching method with considerations such as a suitable Internet platform, the existence of motivation and capability in professors, the selection of appropriate content can lead to satisfaction of adult students working in medical centers and individual growth and provide more versatility and interaction in the classroom.

Keywords

References

1. Mazloom A, Mansoori S, Okhovat M. Factors
influencing the use of e-learning in Shahid
Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences
according to interpretative structural model. Q J
Educ Stud Dev Cent Shahid Sadoughi Univ Med
Sci Yazd. 2018;13(3):194–208.
2. Kasani AA, Shams Mourkani H, Seraji G,
Rezaeizadeh F, Abedi M. E-Learning Challenges in
Iran: A Research Synthesis. Int Rev Res Open
Distrib Learn. 2020;21(4):96–116.
3. Ruiz JG, Mintzer MJ, Leipzig RM. The impact
of e-learning in medical education. Acad Med.
2006;81(3):207–12.
4. Garrison DR, Vaughan ND. Blended Learning in
Higher Education: Framework, Principles, and
Guidelines. Blended Learning in Higher Education:
Framework, Principles, and Guidelines. 2008. 1–
245.
5. Poon J. A cross-country comparison on the use
of blended learning in property education. Prop
Manag. 2014;32(2):154–75.
6. Roseth C, Akcaoglu M, Zellner A. Blending
Synchronous Face-to-face and Computer-
Supported Cooperative Learning in a Hybrid
Doctoral Seminar. TechTrends. 2013;57(3):54–9.
7. Klein HJ, Noe RA, Wang C. Motivation to learn
and course outcomes: The impact of delivery
mode, learning goal orientation, and perceived
barriers and enablers. Pers Psychol. 2006
Sep;59(3):665–702.
8. Zarabian F. The Study of Blended- Teaching
Methods on Learning, Motivation and Interest in
learning Anatomy Courses in Medical Students.
Res Med Educ. 2018;10(1):63-71 [Full text in
Persian].
9. Owston R, York D, Malhotra T. Blended
learning in large enrolment courses: Student
perceptions across four different instructional
models. Australas J Educ Technol. 2019;35(5):29–
45.
10. Speziale H, Streubert H, Carpenter D.
Qualitative research in nursing: Advancing the
humanistic
11. Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content
analysis process. Artic J Adv Nurs. 2008
Apr;62(1):107–15.
12. Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three Approaches to
Qualitative Content Analysis. Qual Heal Res
Citations Ebsco Electron Journals Serv. 2005
Nov;15(9):1277–88.
13. Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Competing paradigms
in qualitative research. Handb Qual Res.
1994;2(6):105–17.
14. Maarop AH, Embi MA. Implementation of
Blended Learning in Higher Learning Institutions:
A Review of Literature. Int Educ Stud.
2016;9(3):41–52.
15. Schechter RL, Kazakoff ER, Bundschuh K,
Prescott JE, Macaruso P. Exploring the Impact of
Engaged Teachers on Implementation Fidelity and
Reading Skill Gains in a Blended Learning
Reading Program. Read Psychol. 2017 Aug
18;38(6):553–79.
16. Uz R, Uzun A. The influence of blended
learning environment on self-regulated and self-
directed learning skills of learners. Eur J Educ Res.
2018;7(4):877–86.
17. Bosch C, Mentz E, Reitsma GM. Integrating
cooperative learning into the combined blended
learning design model: Implications for students’
intrinsic motivation. Int J Mob Blended Learn.
2019;11(1):58–73.
18. Ying ANL, Yang I. Academics and Learners’
Perceptions on Blended Learning as a Strategic
Initiative to Improve Student Learning Experience.
MATEC Web Conf. 2016;87(04005):1–5.

Article View: 4,027
PDF Download: 2,204

Horizon of Medical Education Development

Explaining the experiences of Part-time undergraduate operating room students from teaching by blended learning method: A qualitative approach

References

References

Volume 13, Issue 1
June 2022
Pages 1-10

Explaining the experiences of Part-time undergraduate operating room students from teaching by blended learning method: A qualitative approach

References

References

Volume 13, Issue 1June 2022Pages 1-10

Volume 13, Issue 1
June 2022
Pages 1-10