- XML
- PDF 1.67 M
- Supplementary File
- 1285چکیده صوتی.mp3
Abstract
Introduction: Continuous improvement of the quality of the education system requires assessment of the performance of teachers in order to make more informed decisions regarding the improvement of teaching methods. The study aims to explore the educational performance of Mashhad health faculty members from the perspective of graduate students through a qualitative
approach.
Materials & Methods: The study was conducted as a qualitative content analysis. The research population was post graduate students. Sampling was started based on the objective and continued until information saturation, i.e. no new information was received, in the form of theoretical sampling. It was used to collect data through face-to-face interviews. Immediately after
conducting the interviews, the recorded voices of the participants were typed word by word in Word software and analyzed using MAXQDA10 software.
Results: The functional challenges of professors from the point of view of postgraduate students were identified in four areas: structural, moral, scientific competence and communication skills in 10 subcategories (lack of time management, student abuse, lack of inclusiveness, not updating the curriculum, unavailability of faculty member, lack of specialized guidance, several teachers
for one lesson, lack of expression, lack of knowledge, and lack of experience).
Conclusion: Updating educational curricula, more interaction between professors and students, using professors with executive skills and experience in related courses, strengthening communication skills and expression techniques,
having patience and tolerance, and observing professional ethics can play an important role in the educational performance in faculty member.
1.Rostamzadeh Z, Zareh Z, Homan K. The viewpoint of paramedical students’ of Urmia University of Medical Sciences about the influential factors on teachers’ evaluation. Future of Medical Education Journal. 2013;3(3):41-6.
2.Kopnina H. Education for the future? Critical evaluation of education for sustainable development goals. The Journal of Environmental Education. 2020;51(4):280-91.
3.Hassanzadeh Taheri M, Riyasi H, Miri M, Davari M, Hajiabadi M. Survey of observing educational rules and regulations by educational staff in different faculties of Birjand University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Birjand University of Medical Sciences. 2009;16(1):58-64.
4.Blanch-Hartigan D. Medical students’ self-assessment of performance: results from three meta-analyses. Patient education and counseling. 2011;84(1):3-9.
5.Gillespie M. Student–teacher connection: a place of possibility. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2005;52(2):211-9.
6.Morrison J. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: Evaluation. BMJ: British Medical Journal. 2003;326(7385):385.
7.Bastani P, Amini M, Taher Nejad K, Shaarbafchi Zadeh N. Faculty members’ viewpoints about the present and the ideal teacher evaluation system in Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism. 2013;1(4):140-7.
8.Amini M, Honardar M. The view of faculties and medical students about evaluation of faculty teaching experiences. Koomesh journal. 2008;9(3):171-8.
9.Bowles LT. The evaluation of teaching. Medical Teacher. 2000;22(3):221-4.
10.Ranjbar M, Vahidshahi K, Mahmoudi M. Viewpoints of the attendings and medical students about the Students' evaluation of the attendings, Mazandaran. Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. 2007;16(56):126-35.
11.Zamanzadeh V, Parsa Yekta z, Fathi Azar E, Valizadeh L. The Clinical Teaching Role of Nursing Teachers. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2002;2(2):27-33.
12.Hajiaghajani S. Viewpoints of Shahid beheshti university faculty members about the effect of their evaluation by students on teaching activities. Res Med Sci. 1999;1(8).
13.Merghati khoii E A, RImaz S, Zarei F, dastoorpour M. Exploring The Teaching and Learning Approaches from the viewpoint of Postgraduate Students and their Lecturers. Iran J Health Educ Health Promot 2013; 1 (3) :67-82
14.Jamshidi S, Baghaei F, Abdolsamadi HR, Faradmal J, Soltanian AR, Ahmadiani E. Evaluation of Academic Staffs’ Viewpoint about Their Assessment by Students in Hamadan University of Medical Sciences (2011 – 2012). Research in Medical Education. 2013;5(2):39-45.
15.Zahedi M, Amirmaleki Tabrizi H. Medical education effectiveness from the viewpoints of medical students of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Iranian journal of medical education. 2008;7(2):289-98.
17.Sadighmaroufi S, Mohammadi A, Mousavi S, Raadabadi M. Study of the most important factors influencing the effectiveness of teaching from viewpoint of graduate students:AHP model approach. Journal of Medical Education and Development. 2014;9(3):58-66.
18.Mahmoudi H., Pazargadi M., Ebadi A. Evaluation of faculty teaching experience by postgraduate students. Bimonthly of Education Strategies in Medical Sciences. 2009;2(2):1-2.
19.Zamani Z, Asadi I, Ameri Z. The Necessity of Correction of the Educational Curriculum of Medical Sciences Based On COVID-19. Horizon of Medical Education Development. 2022;13(3):95-85.
20.Vaezi R, Maddah Shariati N, Azmandian MS. Academic evaluation criteria in mind research students in the school of management and accounting of allameh tabatabai university. Quarterly Journal of Public Organizations Management. 2013;2(1):29-44.
30.Talebzadeh Shoshtari L, Pourshafaie H. Attributions of Successful Professors in Promoting Academic Motivation in Birjand University Students. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education. 2011;17(2):81-97.
31.Alhija FN-A. Teaching in higher education: Good teaching through students’ lens. Studies in Educational Evaluation. 2017; 54:4-12.
)