1. Adcock, A. B., & Van Eck, R. N. Reliability
and factor structure of the attitude toward tutoring
agent scale (ATTAS). Journal of Interactive
Learning Research, 2005; 16(2): 195-217.
2. Mayer, R. E., and DaPra, C. S. An Embodiment
effect in computer-based learning with animated
pedagogical agents. Journal of Experimental
Psychology-Applied, 2012; 18(3): 239-252. doi:
10.1037/a0028616.
3. zogul, G., Johnson, A. M., Atkinson, R. K., &
Reisslein, M. Investigating the impact of
pedagogical agent gender matching and learner
choice on learning outcomes and perceptions.
Computers & Education, 2013; 67(0): 36-50. doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.compedu. 2013.02.006
4. Lin, L., Atkinson, R. K., Christopherson, R. M.,
Joseph, S. S., & Harrison, C. J. Animated agents
and learning: Does the type of verbal feedback they
provide matter? Computers & Education, 2013; 67:
239–249. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.017
5. Ergül, E. and Koç, M. The role of animated
agents in web-based distance education, Procedia -
Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2013; 83: 1016 –
1022.
6. Choi, S., and Clark, E. R. Cognitive and
affective benefits of an animated pedagogical agent
for learning English as a second language. Journal
of Educational Computing Research, 2006; 34(4):
441-466.
Chou, C., Chan, T., and Lin, C. Redefining the
learning companion: the past, present, and future of
educational agents, Computers & Education, 2002;
40: 255–269.
7. Morton. H., and Jack, A. M. Scenario-based
spoken interaction with virtual agents. Computer
Assisted Language Learning, 2005; 18(3): 171-191.
8.Moreno, R. Multimedia learning with animated
pedagogical agents. In R. Mayer (Ed.), The
Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning,
2005: 507-523. New York, NY: Cambridge
University Press.
9. Pramuditha, S. An Animated Pedagogical Agent
for SQL-Tutor, University of Canterbury, 1999.
Retrieved from https://ir.canterbury. ac.nz/handle
/10092/14566
10. Veletsianos, G., & Russell, G. S. Pedagogical
agents. In Handbook of Rresearch on Educational
Communications and Technology, 2014: 759-769.
Springer New York.
11. Clarebout, G., Elen, J., Johnson, W.L., and
Shaw, E. Animated pedagogical agents: An
opportunity to be grasped? Journal of Educational
Multimedia and Hypermedia, 2002; 11(3): 267-
286.
12. Kamil M. A. and Ferneley, E. The use of
animated agents in e-learning environments: an
exploratory, interpretive case study, ALT-J, 2006;
14(2): 153-168.
13. Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. Guidelines for
performing systematic literature reviews in
software engineering version 2.3. (EBSE Technical
Report EBSE-2007-01). Retrieved from
https://www.elsevier.com/
__data/promis_misc/525444system
aticreviewsguide.pdf
15. Savin-Baden M., Bhakta R., Mason-Robbie V.,
Burden D. An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of
Using Pedagogical Agents for Teaching in
Inclusive Ways. In: Knox J., Wang Y., Gallagher
M. (eds) Artificial Intelligence and Inclusive
Education. Perspectives on Rethinking and
Reforming Education. Springer, Singapore, 2019.
Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-
13-8161-4_7
16. Roth, T., Appel, J., Schwingel, A., and
Rumpler, M. Learning in virtual physics
laboratories assisted by a pedagogical agent, The
Multimedia in Physics Teaching and Learning
community, Journal of Physics: Conference Series,
2019. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1223/1/012001
17.Hayashi, Y. Multiple pedagogical
conversational agents to support learner-learner
collaborative learning: Effects of splitting
suggestion types, Cognitive Systems Research,
2019; 54: 246-257, https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.cogsys.2018.04.005
18. Mohammadhasani, N., Fardanesh, H., Hatami,
J. and et al. The pedagogical agent enhances
mathematics learning in ADHD students,
Education and Information Technology, 2018; 23:
2299-2308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-
9710-x