1. Green ME. Ellis CL. Fremont P. Batty H.
Faculty evaluation in Departments of Family
Medicine: do our universities measure up? Medical
education. 1998;32(6):597-606.
2. Shinkfield AJ. Stufflebeam DL. Teacher
evaluation: Guide to effective practice.
Netherlands: Springer Science & Business Media;
2012.
3. Dienemann J. Shaffer C. Faculty performance
appraisal systems: Procedures and criteria. Journal
of professional nursing. 1992;8(3):148-54.
4. Rifkin T. The status and scope of faculty
evaluation. Bethesda: ERIC Clearinghouse; 1995.
Available from: http://www.ericdigests.org/1996-
1/status.htm
5. Nutter DO. Bond JS. Coller BS. D'Alessandri
RM. Gewertz BL. Nora LM. et al. Measuring
faculty effort and contributions in medical
education. Academic Medicine. 2000;75(2):200-7.
6. Nunn T. Cosker T. Bose D. Pallister I.
Immediate application of improvised pelvic binder
as first step in extended resuscitation from life-
threatening hypovolaemic shock in conscious
patients with unstable pelvic injuries. Injury.
2007;38(1):125-8.
7. Glazerman S. Goldhaber D. Loeb S. Raudenbush
S. Staiger DO. Whitehurst GJ. et al. Passing
muster: Evaluating teacher evaluation systems.
Brown Center on Education Policy at Brookings.
2011;1(1):1-36.
8. University TMS. Faculty Handbook Proposed
Revision for Section evaluation. USA:
http://www.missuristate.edu/provest/faculty; 2017.
9. Bland CJ. Wersal L. VanLoy W. Jacott W.
Evaluating faculty performance: a systematically
designed and assessed approach. Academic
medicine. 2002;77(1):15-30.
10. Chambers DW. Boyarsky H. Peltier B. Fendler
F. Development of a Mission‐Focused Faculty
Evaluation System. Journal of dental education.
2003;67(1):10-22.
11. Madison A. Demonstrating performance and
accountability through mission-based
evaluation.[cited 2005 Jun 13]. Avalable from:
http://www.nonprofitquarterly.org/content/view/15
4/28.
12. Dailey A. Accreditation preparation: A Faculty
Evaluation Model Based on WCET Best Practice
Standards. Park University. 2004;14(1):19-31.
13. Faubert V. School evaluation: Current practices
in OECD countries and a literature review. OECD
Publishing; 2009.
14. Gordon P. Running head: Student evaluations
of college instructors. Retrieved September.
2005;78(1):18-30.
15. Miller J. Seldin P. Changing Practices in
Faculty Evaluations: Can Better Evaluation Make a
Difference? Academy. 2014;100(1):10-22.
16. Danielson C. McGreal TL. Teacher evaluation
to enhance professional practice: Ascd; 2000.
17. Pincavage A. Cifu A. Faculty member feedback
reports. The Clinical Teacher. 2015;12(1):50-4.
18. Goe L. Bell C. Little O. Approaches to
evaluating teacher effectiveness: A research
synthesis. National Comprehensive Center for
Teacher Quality. 2008;17(1):10-18.
19. Duong T-VT. Do T-D. Nguyen N-P. editors.
Exploiting faculty evaluation forms to improve
teaching quality: an analytical review. 2015
Science and Information Conference (SAI); 2015.
20. University MS. Faculty Evaluation Procedures
for Reappointment USA: www.crlt.umich.edu;
2016.
21. Minnesota Uo. Faculty Evaluation USA:
Faculty Evaluation Committee (FEC); 2017.
22. TUoT. aculty-evaluation USA:
provost.utk.edu/faculty-evaluation; 2017.
23. https://www.ualberta.ca/science/about-
us/faculty-and-staff-resources/faculty-evaluation
Aou. faculty-evaluation canada:
https://www.ualberta.ca/science/about-us/faculty-
and-staff-resources/faculty-evaluation; 2018.
24. Cou. faculty evaluation canada:
https//:cumming.ucalgary.ca/.../criteria; 2017.
25. College TNs. Faculty/Evaluation USA:2016.
nsc.smartcatalogiq.com/en/College...and...Faculty/
Evaluation.
26. Nursing.jhu.edu/TUoJH. faculty evaluation.
USA:
faculty_research/faculty/handbook/index.html;2018
;11(1):15-25.
27. Houston TUo. faculty-course-evaluation:
www.uh.edu/measurement-evaluation.../faculty-
course-evaluation Measurement and Evaluation
Center; 2017.
28. Aleamoni L. Who are better at evaluating
faculty teaching peers or students. Psychology and
Cognitive Sciences – Open Journal. 2016;3(1):15-
30.
29. Kyriakides L. Creemers B. Testing the dynamic
model of educational efectiveness: teacher effects
on cognetive and affective outcoms. Academia.
2006;77(1):15-30.
30. University KS. Criteria and Procedures on
Faculty Evaluation forTenure, and Promotion
USA: Department of Chemical Engineering:
College of Engineering; 2018.
31.
Documents.manchester.ac.uk/display.aspx?DocID=
10027 TUomFE. Faculty Evaluation UK: Faculty
Evaluation (2016/09)
documents.manchester.ac.uk/display.aspx?DocID=
10027.2016.
32. University US. faculty evaluation USA:
https://www.usu.edu/fsenate/handbook/FSHandboo
k; 2016-2017.
33. Provost.uga.edu/index.php/policies/.../1-06-1-
written-annual-review UoG. faculty evaluation
USA: provost.uga.edu/index.php/policies/.../1-06-
1-written-annual-review; 2016.
34. Carolina TUoN. Faculty Evaluation Model.
[Online]. USA:
<http://www.uncp.edu/aa/handbook/01-
02/pdf/Chapter_4A-1_11.6.PDF>. [20/06/2005].
2017